No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout (2024)

No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout (1)

No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout

&nbspAdvancedRectangleBalancer612 foundations

A nuclear power build layout that will provide 15,000mw with 0 nuclear waste. This build is part of our super-efficient build guide series.

TotalXclipse 108871 2021-05-02

This Satisfactory build guide has been produced to help you understand how to run a nuclear power setup and more importantly how to recycle nuclear waste. This guide will include video, andphotos to help break down the build for you.

Video Guide associated:
Satisfactory Guide | Nuclear Power No Waste Build Layout

Requirements

Due to the late tier nature of this build you will need to have unlocked partical enrichment.
We will also require the following resources:

  • 4 - 22 Power Shards
  • 120 Uranium per minute.
  • 72 Concrete
  • 90 Sulfuric Acid
  • 3.6 Encased Industrial Beams
  • 7.8 Electromagnetic Control Rods
  • 30 Silica
  • 18 Nitric acid
  • 5.4 Steel beams
  • and 3 Heat sinks per minute

As well as resources for:

  • 6 Nuclear Power Plants
  • 1 Particle Accelorator
  • 4 Manufacturers
  • 4 Blenders
  • 1 Assembler
  • 1 Awesome sink
  • A minimum of 6 Water Extractors.

This build will generate 15,000MW of power per minute with 0 waste. For this build I recommend building on a 36 x 17 grid, this will give you ample space for error should you struggle with the positioning of the build.


Part 1 - Power Plants

Once you have the 36x17 grid set up our first job is to place our 6 Nuclear power plants – I’ve built these every 5 foundations from the top right hand of the grid with the inputs and outputs covering a single foundation, this will give you enough room to run the water input and waste output down the side of the build.

Make sure that you have one to oneand a half foundation's space available at the back but you can make this more compact of spread out as you wish.

Once these are placed run the output all the way round to the back of the powerplants, here we will merge them and send them to the left of the build to be recycled. Above these lines you will also run the water pipes.

No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout (2)


Part 2 - Water Extractors

For this build we will need a total of 1800 water per minute. That’s 300 water per power plant, to make this easy I’ve built a single water extractor per power plant and overclocked itto 250%. This provides us with the required 300 water per plant per minute. Rather than combining water pipes into Mk2’s, I’ve ran six seperatemk1 pipes, this saves us from any water balancing complications that have been prominent in update 4. Run these pipes around the back and then feed each pipe into a power plant. Remember depending on the build height, you may need to use pumps.

No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout (3)

Part 3 - Fuel Rod Production

Next lets build the fuel rod manufacturers. The reason we're producing these before the blenders is so that we can run the conveyors to the nuclear power plants. That way we'll know how much space we have for the blenders (following this build though, you will have plenty of free space.)

We will place 3 manufactures down, you can place these three foundations deep in the bottom right hand of the grid.
Make sure these outputs are merged together and from there you can either load balance or if you’re not starved for power currently, manifold the fuel rods into the power plants. Note if you want this area as free from radiation as possible, you will want to load balance.

These Manufactures should all be set to 100% clockspeed producing uranium fuel rods.
At this point we willinput sixof the magnetic control rods and the 3.6 Encased Industrial Beams. These will also be inputted with theinto these along with the Encased uranium cells which we shall produce now.

These Manufactures should all be set to 100% clockspeed producing uranium fuel rods.
At this point we willinput sixof the magnetic control rods and the 3.6 Encased Industrial Beams, finally you will want to input the Encased uranium cells which we shall produce now. Again with the Encased Uranium cells being radioactive, if you want to keep this area as clean as possible, I recommend load balancing these lines.

No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout (4)

Part 4 - Encased Uranium Cells

The encase uranium cells will be produced in the blender, for this we will place down three blenders across from the previous manufactures, I have placed these two foundations deep into the grid with a small space in between the Manufacturers to bus the encased uranium cells to the manufacturers.

The blenders should be set to 80% clockspeed with sulfuric acid, uranium ore and concrete being fed into these. To ensure we do not have back flow problems I have placed valves, and limited the input lines to a total of 32 sulfuric acid each.

At this point we will need to add an output for the excess sulfuric acid, these blenders will merge their sulfuric acid output and send it across to the left of the grid to the recycling section. At this point in theory we could be running the six power plants but we would be storing waste and have to deal with the excess sulfuric acid.

No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout (5)

Part 4 - Recycling Nuclear Waste

To recycle the waste uranium, we will need to place a blender with the inputs facing the bottom of the grid in the top left hand corner.

At this point we will create a load balancer for the waste line. Creating a 3:1 ratio of waste heading to the blender. To do this place a splitter dividing into two lines. One will lead to a merger, and the second line will lead to another splitter which will split one line into the same merger we just placed and the second line heading towards the bottom of the build. The merger will then feed into the blender.

No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout (6)

This blender will be producing non-fissile uranium and will require 30 silica per minute as well as 18 nitric acid per minute. It will also require 18 sulfuric acid from the 24 waste sulfuric acid we've just produced. In order to do this place a pipe junction and using gravity create a priority split to the blender, the rest of the sulphuric acid will join up with the sulphuric acid line leading to the blenders producing the encased uranium cells.
Make sure that there is a valve limiting the input of sulfuric acid for the whole buildbefore the junction set to 90 and the second valve by the blender leading to the main sulfuric acid lineset to 6. This will create a looped system.

The recycling blender should now be set to 120% overclock.At this point we have a water output line – this can be used in any manufacturing you require, or you can loop it to the nearest power plant and reduce the water coming from the water extractor.

At this point, you will run the blenders conveyor output to the particle accelorator.

No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout (7)

Part 5 - The Particle Accelorator and Recycling

Next place the particle accelorator down, the inputs should be on the left of the grid and the outputs on the right. Set this to plutonium pellets with a 60% underclock. The firstinput should be the excess waste that we were load balancing earlier. The second, the non-fissil uranium.Once the particle accelerator turns these resources into plutonium pellets, you can run them to an assembler set to 180% overclock along with 36 concrete per minute to produce encased plutonium cells. This will then be outputted to our final production line.

No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout (8)

Part 6 - Plutonium Fuel Rods

Now that we are producing Encased Plutonium cells we can transport these to a manufacturer, which I’ve placed next to the assembler. Here we will also require the input of steel beams, electromagnetic control rods and Heat sinks to produce a total of 0.3 plutonium fuel rods per minute. These can obviously be used as power but I would highly recommend sinking these rods in an awesome sink. Giving you an awesome amount of points, and no waste!

No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout (9)

We’re very proud to have launched this website and hope you have found the guide both helpful and enjoyable.We look forward to updating the site weekly with new guides and layouts.

If you have a particular layout or guide you’d be interested in sharing with the community, we’d gladly giveyou the chance to be an author on our site, get in touch with us.

No Nuclear Waste - Nuclear Power Super-Efficient Build Layout (2024)

FAQs

What is the safest nuclear power plant design? ›

A new breed of small modular reactors (SMRs) is being developed. They are safer and less exposed to dangers like earthquakes and meltdowns than traditional large-scale reactors. As with all nuclear power plants, they don't emit greenhouse gases, meaning they support global efforts to reach net-zero emissions.

What is the biggest downside of a nuclear power plant? ›

The major disadvantages of nuclear power plant are as follows:
  • Disposal and storage of nuclear waste.
  • Uranium decomposes into harmful sub atomic masses.
  • Accidental leakage of radiation and large-scale accidents can be catastrophic..
  • Installation cost is very high as compared to the other power station.

Why are breeder reactors not used? ›

Sodium cooled breeder reactors have severe reliability problems. The necessity of keeping air from coming into contact with the sodium coolant makes refueling and repairing fast reactors much more difficult and time-consuming than for water cooled reactors.

Why not build small nuclear power plants? ›

Small reactors also raise all of the usual concerns associated with nuclear power, including the risk of severe accidents, the linkage to nuclear weapons proliferation, and the production of radioactive waste that has no demonstrated solution because of technical and social challenges.

Are nuclear power plants cheap to build? ›

Nuclear power plants are expensive to build but relatively cheap to run. In many places, nuclear energy is competitive with fossil fuels as a means of electricity generation. Waste disposal and decommissioning costs are usually fully included in the operating costs.

How long will an SMR last? ›

Power plants equipped with SMRs are designed to refuel every 3–7 years, compared to 1–2 years for conventional plants. Some SMRs are even designed to operate for up to 30 years without refuelling.

Why do we not use thorium reactors? ›

The reasons were that uranium-fuelled reactors were more efficient, the research was proven and thorium's breeding ratio was thought insufficient to produce enough fuel to support development of a commercial nuclear industry.

How much does it cost to build a breeder reactor? ›

Constructing a 1000-MWe light-water reactor would cost about $1.7 billion, while a fast breeder reactor system of comparable power could cost $3.4 billion.

What country has retired its breeder nuclear reactors? ›

The U.S., Germany and the U.K. have all largely abandoned their breeder reactor programs, while France and Kazakhstan have shut down reactors but continue to research and develop reactor technologies.

Have any SMR been built? ›

As of 2023, only China and Russia have successfully built operational SMRs. The US Department of Energy had estimated the first SMR in the United States would be completed by NuScale Power around 2030, but this deal has since fallen through after the customers backed out due to rising costs.

Why won t the US build nuclear power plants? ›

Barriers to and risks associated with an increasing use of nuclear energy include operational risks and the associated safety concerns, uranium mining risks, financial and regulatory risks, unresolved waste management issues, nuclear weapons proliferation concerns, and adverse public opinion.

Why doesn't China have nuclear power plants? ›

Inland Construction Barriers and Safety Shortfalls. China imposed a moratorium on inland nuclear construction following the 2011 f*ckushima accident, which impedes nuclear from hitting the 10% of power generation goal.

What is the safest type of power plant? ›

Nuclear and renewables are far, far safer than fossil fuels.

What is the safest nuclear element? ›

Thorium fuel cycles offer attractive features, including lower levels of waste generation, less transuranic elements in that waste, and providing a diversification option for nuclear fuel supply. Also, the use of thorium in most reactor types leads to extra safety margins.

Are there any safe nuclear reactors? ›

The reactor

All nuclear power plants in Canada use the CANDU design - a safe, reliable, reactor technology. CANDU reactors produce electricity through a process known as fission. Fission is the process of splitting atoms of natural uranium inside the reactor, releasing radiation and heat.

What is the most efficient type of nuclear reactor? ›

Supercritical water-cooled reactors (SCWRs) offer high thermal efficiency (i.e., about 45% vs. about 33% efficiency for current LWRs) and considerable simplification. The mission of the SCWR is generation of low-cost electricity.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Nicola Considine CPA

Last Updated:

Views: 5606

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Nicola Considine CPA

Birthday: 1993-02-26

Address: 3809 Clinton Inlet, East Aleisha, UT 46318-2392

Phone: +2681424145499

Job: Government Technician

Hobby: Calligraphy, Lego building, Worldbuilding, Shooting, Bird watching, Shopping, Cooking

Introduction: My name is Nicola Considine CPA, I am a determined, witty, powerful, brainy, open, smiling, proud person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.